
<!-- CUSTOM POST TYPE XMLRPC SUPPORT -->
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NolinLeChasseur.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com</link>
	<description>business-to-business marketing strategy, and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is website visitor tracking going too far? by Nolin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/11/24/is-website-visitor-tracking-going-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=184#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I like the analogy, Scott.  Makes me wonder if/when there will be a PVR commercial-skipping or BitTorrent equivalent in this case, where someone will start aggregating content and providing it commercial-free, or at &quot;no charge&quot;, thereby causing us to further evolve the model.

More food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the analogy, Scott.  Makes me wonder if/when there will be a PVR commercial-skipping or BitTorrent equivalent in this case, where someone will start aggregating content and providing it commercial-free, or at &#8220;no charge&#8221;, thereby causing us to further evolve the model.</p>
<p>More food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is website visitor tracking going too far? by scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/11/24/is-website-visitor-tracking-going-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=184#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Another great post and discussion.

I say track away!  And don&#039;t come for free content if you don&#039;t want to be observed.  It is kinda like the TV advertising deal - free shows for permission to run 30 seconds ads!

But just like ads had to be become more valuable (ie entertaining etc) the people who act on my data need to do it with more sophistication and value in order to engage me!

Cheers

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post and discussion.</p>
<p>I say track away!  And don&#8217;t come for free content if you don&#8217;t want to be observed.  It is kinda like the TV advertising deal &#8211; free shows for permission to run 30 seconds ads!</p>
<p>But just like ads had to be become more valuable (ie entertaining etc) the people who act on my data need to do it with more sophistication and value in order to engage me!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Draft Framework for Knowledge Marketing by Axel</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/10/13/a-draft-framework-for-knowledge-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=175#comment-77</guid>
		<description>An interesting model, Nolin. A nice way to formalize the process. I would like to see how it applies to a concrete example, such as the ecommerce solution provider you mentioned. A case study?

Here&#039;s a question that always haunts me. Your model starts with &quot;Extracting Knowledge&quot;. Makes sense.  But how do you determine whether that knowledge adds real value, unique value, to the provider&#039;s community, or whether that &quot;knowledge&quot; is just more noise in an already very noisy world. And how do you decide (or who decides) what is noice and what is unique, valuable content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting model, Nolin. A nice way to formalize the process. I would like to see how it applies to a concrete example, such as the ecommerce solution provider you mentioned. A case study?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a question that always haunts me. Your model starts with &#8220;Extracting Knowledge&#8221;. Makes sense.  But how do you determine whether that knowledge adds real value, unique value, to the provider&#8217;s community, or whether that &#8220;knowledge&#8221; is just more noise in an already very noisy world. And how do you decide (or who decides) what is noice and what is unique, valuable content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Draft Framework for Knowledge Marketing by Nolin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/10/13/a-draft-framework-for-knowledge-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=175#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Good point on &#039;tone&#039;.

I need to dig into Scott&#039;s thinking still...thanks for the reminder.  The reason I&#039;ve keyed on knowledge as the root is that I think there&#039;s an opportunity to focus on where one&#039;s true expertise lies rather than trying to say in just the right way what the audience thinks it wants to hear.  I believe there is power in the natural affinity between a vendor&#039;s trueknowledge/expertise and a prospect&#039;s perceived value of that knowledge.  I also believe that power should translate into customer relationships if nurtured effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point on &#8216;tone&#8217;.</p>
<p>I need to dig into Scott&#8217;s thinking still&#8230;thanks for the reminder.  The reason I&#8217;ve keyed on knowledge as the root is that I think there&#8217;s an opportunity to focus on where one&#8217;s true expertise lies rather than trying to say in just the right way what the audience thinks it wants to hear.  I believe there is power in the natural affinity between a vendor&#8217;s trueknowledge/expertise and a prospect&#8217;s perceived value of that knowledge.  I also believe that power should translate into customer relationships if nurtured effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Draft Framework for Knowledge Marketing by Axle Davids</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/10/13/a-draft-framework-for-knowledge-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Axle Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=175#comment-75</guid>
		<description>&quot;tone&quot; - personality may be a more &quot;plug and play&quot; term

&quot;Extract / Transform / Infuse&quot; @dmscott advocates less of a &quot;what do you know?&quot; and more of a &quot;what do they want to hear?&quot; philosophy. Something as simple as truly understanding the B2B client&#039;s pains and finding a way to make them smile could be considered a sign of meaningful knowledge in the age of entertrainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;tone&#8221; &#8211; personality may be a more &#8220;plug and play&#8221; term</p>
<p>&#8220;Extract / Transform / Infuse&#8221; @dmscott advocates less of a &#8220;what do you know?&#8221; and more of a &#8220;what do they want to hear?&#8221; philosophy. Something as simple as truly understanding the B2B client&#8217;s pains and finding a way to make them smile could be considered a sign of meaningful knowledge in the age of entertrainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on inbound marketing and outbound marketing &#8211; the revolving door strategy by Axel</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/04/28/inbound-marketing-and-outbound-marketing-the-revolving-door-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=149#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Wow is right! Totally agree. I just stumbled upon your post. Your analysis pretty well aligns with the business case for our new Sales &amp; Marketing Automation venture: www.Gossamar.com

Here&#039;s 3 of your top concerns, and how Gossamar is addressing them:

1. &quot;No one does a great job with the entire picture&quot;. For starters, we&#039;re integrating SEO/SEM, Reputation Management Analytics, Demand Generation (Inbound and Outbound components), and CRM silos. We&#039;ve integrated the entire spectrum into one central dashboard for B2B marketers to manage their marketing effort. Check out http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/09/27/the-inbound-marketing-dashboard/

2. &quot;Pricing is all over the map ... sky-high fees&quot;. We&#039;ve addressed that by partnering with SMB-oriented suppliers with SMB pricing. It wasn&#039;t easy. Hundreds of different suppliers, each with different value/pricing logic.

3. &quot;Minimum vendor relationships to manage&quot;. Most SMBs don&#039;t have the internal resources to research, implement, and manage all the silos. So we&#039;ve developed 3 options to give SMBs the choice of how much stuff they want to keep in-house, and how much they want to outsource. Check out: http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/getting-started/

In your blog you ask &quot;What have I missed?&quot; Let me ask you, Nolin, what have we missed?

Keep up the great insight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow is right! Totally agree. I just stumbled upon your post. Your analysis pretty well aligns with the business case for our new Sales &amp; Marketing Automation venture: <a href="http://www.Gossamar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Gossamar.com</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s 3 of your top concerns, and how Gossamar is addressing them:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;No one does a great job with the entire picture&#8221;. For starters, we&#8217;re integrating SEO/SEM, Reputation Management Analytics, Demand Generation (Inbound and Outbound components), and CRM silos. We&#8217;ve integrated the entire spectrum into one central dashboard for B2B marketers to manage their marketing effort. Check out <a href="http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/09/27/the-inbound-marketing-dashboard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/09/27/the-inbound-marketing-dashboard/</a></p>
<p>2. &#8220;Pricing is all over the map &#8230; sky-high fees&#8221;. We&#8217;ve addressed that by partnering with SMB-oriented suppliers with SMB pricing. It wasn&#8217;t easy. Hundreds of different suppliers, each with different value/pricing logic.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;Minimum vendor relationships to manage&#8221;. Most SMBs don&#8217;t have the internal resources to research, implement, and manage all the silos. So we&#8217;ve developed 3 options to give SMBs the choice of how much stuff they want to keep in-house, and how much they want to outsource. Check out: <a href="http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/getting-started/" rel="nofollow">http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/getting-started/</a></p>
<p>In your blog you ask &#8220;What have I missed?&#8221; Let me ask you, Nolin, what have we missed?</p>
<p>Keep up the great insight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on inbound marketing and outbound marketing &#8211; the revolving door strategy by nolin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/04/28/inbound-marketing-and-outbound-marketing-the-revolving-door-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=149#comment-71</guid>
		<description>This just isn&#039;t trendy enough yet. :) Thanks for the compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just isn&#8217;t trendy enough yet. <img src='http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for the compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on inbound marketing and outbound marketing &#8211; the revolving door strategy by scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/04/28/inbound-marketing-and-outbound-marketing-the-revolving-door-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=149#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Wow, comments on your twitter posts (which are good) but nothing on this post.  The world is missing the point.  Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, comments on your twitter posts (which are good) but nothing on this post.  The world is missing the point.  Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some more practical business-oriented Twitter advice by Sasha Muradali</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/05/20/some-more-practical-business-oriented-twitter-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha Muradali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=173#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to my blog! I really appreciate your support. So glad you enjoyed reading my tips :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to my blog! I really appreciate your support. So glad you enjoyed reading my tips <img src='http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on deriving business value from Twitter by Nolin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/2009/04/29/deriving-business-value-from-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nolinlechasseur.com/?p=167#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback and the pass-alongs, Rick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback and the pass-alongs, Rick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

